The media typically exploit trendy readers’ brief consideration span through the use of eye-popping headlines that fail to symbolize the context of the story. Sadly, this follow appears to be rising in reputation all through LGBT media and advocacy teams. One of many main penalties of this exploitation is emotionally manipulating and even totally deceptive LGBT individuals who depend on these sources.
Here’s a nearer take a look at the accuracy of a number of summer time LGBT headlines for instance what is a continuing development.
Jump To Section
- 0.1 “New GOP bill would ban flying of Pride flag at U.S. embassies” —Washington Blade
- 0.2 “Teen Excels High School Despite Being Kicked Out by Parents After Learning He was Gay” — Angle UK
- 0.3 “Woman breaks into gay man’s home, forces him to watch her perform sex act as ‘example’ of how to ‘behave’” — Queerty
- 0.4 “DOJ touts anti-LGBT views, task force at ‘religious freedom’ summit” — Washington Blade
- 0.5 “The Religious Right Appears Intent On Criminalizing Gay Sex Again” — Huffington Submit
- 0.6 “The State Department is retroactively revoking passports for trans citizens” — LGBTQ Nation
- 1 The Want for Trustworthy Reporting
“New GOP bill would ban flying of Pride flag at U.S. embassies” —Washington Blade
This text begins by asserting “A Republican lawmaker in the U.S. House has introduced legislation that appears to be aimed at barring U.S. embassies from flying the Pride flag in recognition of the LGBT community.”
Solely additional into the article does the writer make clear that the lawmaker launched the invoice to “prohibit the flying of any flag other than the United States flag over United States diplomatic and consular posts, and for other purposes.”
Regardless that the article quotes the American Civil Liberties Union admitting that they don’t consider the rainbow flag is particularly focused, they proceed on to say that they’re sure a want to ban the rainbow flag is the motivation behind the “ridiculous” new regulation.
In fact, Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), the invoice’s sponsor, defended the invoice by arguing, “the United States flag is the single greatest symbol of freedom the world has ever known, and there’s no reason for anything but Old Glory to be flying over our embassies and posts around the globe.” No anti-LGBT motivation seems to be concerned.
“Teen Excels High School Despite Being Kicked Out by Parents After Learning He was Gay” — Angle UK
Seth Owen is an 18-year-old highschool co-valedictorian who just lately turned an LGBT image of resistance to bigotry and a logo of hope for younger individuals in search of to flee their unaccepting households.
The story, nevertheless, shouldn’t be as simple because the headline would have readers consider.
Owen was 15 years previous when his father found pictures on Owen’s telephone that strongly indicated the younger man was homosexual. After confronting Owen concerning the photographs, his mother and father despatched him to a counselor, an motion that Owen believed was meant to “make” him straight. The counseling periods didn’t final lengthy, and Owen continued dwelling together with his mother and father for a number of years whereas attending faculty, holding down part-time jobs, and collaborating in lots of extracurricular actions.
When he was 18 years previous, Owen and his father obtained right into a dispute over the household coverage of attending church. Owen disapproved of the conservative views his mother and father’ Baptist church expressed, and not wished to attend. His father informed Owen both he would attend church with everybody within the household or want to maneuver out. Owen selected the latter, shifting in with buddies.
“Woman breaks into gay man’s home, forces him to watch her perform sex act as ‘example’ of how to ‘behave’” — Queerty
Whereas this text initially seems to be a report a few homophobic couple trying to disgrace a homosexual man in a disturbing method, the precise story is way extra critical.
The incident occurred in New Zealand in 2016 when a lady, Laura Jean Landon, together with two unnamed males, used the app Grindr to persuade a homosexual man to satisfy them, underneath the misunderstanding he can be hooking up with one other homosexual man.
The three rang his doorbell and instantly started threatening him with a bat and a gun. They shouted homophobic slurs, broke his belongings, and engaged in sexual acts in entrance of him. Additionally they sexually assaulted the sufferer, forcing him to carry out oral intercourse on each male attackers. The attackers then ransacked his residence and stole his bank cards, money, jewellery, even his automotive.
Landon was sentenced to 4 and half years in jail for collaborating within the assault. The opposite two assailants weren’t talked about.
Unusually, somewhat than emphasizing the seriousness of this violent crime , the publication selected the much more ridiculous angle of headlining a single homophobic act becoming a story of ignorance and bigotry.
“DOJ touts anti-LGBT views, task force at ‘religious freedom’ summit” — Washington Blade
On July 30, 2018, Lawyer Common Jeff Periods introduced the creation of the Spiritual Liberty Activity Pressure, designed to guard the spiritual freedom of all People.
The article in query, nevertheless, failed to point how the DOJ had ”touted” anti-LGBT views. As an alternative, it merely mentions one instance Periods listed in reference to the Supreme Courtruling on the Masterpiece Cake Store. Nearly all of the article goes on to take a position that the message behind the speech is certainly one of unhindered anti-LGBT discrimination beneath the guise of spiritual freedom.
Nevertheless, Periods’ precise assertion describing the brand new process pressure reads, “the Task Force will help the Department fully implement our religious liberty guidance by ensuring that all Justice Department components are upholding that guidance in the cases they bring and defend, the arguments they make in court, the policies and regulations they adopt, and how we conduct our operations. That includes making sure that our employees know their duties to accommodate people of faith.” No LGBT content material was talked about, and positively nothing that could possibly be described as advocating “anti-LGBT views.”
“The Religious Right Appears Intent On Criminalizing Gay Sex Again” — Huffington Submit
Written by Michelangelo Signorile, editor-at-large of Huffington Submit’s “Queer Voices,” this piece largely consists of hypothesis that Brett Kavanaugh’s affirmation to the Supreme Courtroom wouldn’t solely result in the top of same-sex marriage, it additionally would permit states to as soon as once more ban sodomy.
Signorile made an analogous prediction following Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the excessive courtroom. The core of his argument is predicated on feedback by a number of Christian conservative leaders, some greater than a decade previous, relating to the character of homosexuality and the affect of legally recognizing gay behaviors.
Signorile concludes that, as a result of many Christian conservative leaders have affect over this administration, help constitutional originalism, and have traditionally disapproved of efforts to legalize same-sex marriage or decriminalize sodomy, homosexual People’ sexual freedom is immediately in danger.
Signorile asserts, “None of us should believe that even the legality of gay sex, like abortion, can’t be thrown back to the states ― many of which, in the political grip of hard-line religious conservatives, would ban it in a heartbeat.”
In fact, nobody at this time is even hinting at such an agenda, which seems to be purely the work of the writer’s paranoia and creativeness.
“The State Department is retroactively revoking passports for trans citizens” — LGBTQ Nation
This specific story is notable as a result of, inside a day or so of publication, the title of the article was modified to learn “Advocates say fears about trans people’s passports are overblown.” However, the unique tweet and URL nonetheless mirrored the above preliminary headline.
The idea of this accusation includes two transgender ladies who claimed to their passport renewals have been denied due to their gender id.
Within the first case, Gender Justice League Government Director Danni Askini argued that efforts to resume a 10-year passport failed because of the U.S. authorities’s request for proof of citizenship paperwork and proof of transition. Askini tweeted, “Today I was denied a renewal of my US Passport and told I would need to get a judge to unseal child welfare records from Foster care in order to ‘prove’ my US Citizenship. Despite having had all ‘Female’ ID since 1999, they are now demanding ‘Proof of Transition’ for the 1st time.”
Claiming to be in search of asylum in both Sweden or Canada, resulting from worry arising from the anti-trans violence in Seattle, Washington, in addition to persecution from the U.S. authorities on account of efforts on behalf of gender advocacy, Askini decided the passport challenge was intentional discrimination.
Extra doubtless the issue is that, to acquire a 10-year passport, one should present all documentation, together with an unique start certificates and, as Askini underwent the trouble of authorized gender change, medical documentation of any procedures can be required.
The second instance is just like the primary. Janus Rose acquired a telephone name noting a gender marker error famous by the passport processing middle. Rose was advised that the medical documentation provided was inadequate to again up a change on a passport gender marker.
The Nationwide Middle for Transgender Equality later clarified, “All of the incidents we have seen involved unusual circumstances and bureaucratic mistakes by the passport agency and have caused very unfortunate hardship and anxiety for our community members. Please note, the longstanding passport gender marker policy has not changed.”
The Want for Trustworthy Reporting
As all the time, when coping with individuals who consider they’re routinely focused for violence, hatred, and even authorities oppression, accuracy is extraordinarily necessary. LGBT individuals deserve trustworthy reporting, not exaggerated narratives designed to encourage worry, resentment, and anger.
Many homosexual individuals might by no means learn past a headline that merely affirm their fears and prejudices. This could result in political and social activism that merely don’t mirror fact. A political motion shouldn’t need to depend on emotional outrage from really pretend information to achieve success.
Chad Felix Greene is a senior contributor to The Federalist. He’s the writer of the “Reasonably Gay: Essays and Arguments” collection and is a social author specializing in fact in media, conservative concepts and objectives, and true equality beneath the regulation. You’ll be able to comply with him on Twitter @chadfelixg.